Are we just holograms? :P
Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:25 pm
#54589- lilaclegendMember
- Location : not where i want to be
Find this hard to get my head around, but certainly interesting. Especially if you are interested in this subject.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:45 pm
#54598- ChisaGod Of Boobs
- Location : Boston, MA
I'm more a believer of simulation theory, that anything remotely religious
Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:47 pm
#54599- lilaclegendMember
- Location : not where i want to be
of course!
but there are so many different models out there. i find string theory very interesting. just some things i find it so hard to get my head around with my limited knowledge of physics.. but i am really fascinated by it.
this is really amazing stuff.
but there are so many different models out there. i find string theory very interesting. just some things i find it so hard to get my head around with my limited knowledge of physics.. but i am really fascinated by it.
this is really amazing stuff.
Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:55 pm
#54601- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
Chisa wrote:I'm more a believer of simulation theory, that anything remotely religious
That's just a revival of a 400 year old argument, popularized I'm sure, by a well medicated Joe Rogan....which falls apart in philosophy 101. lol
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:08 pm
#54605- ChisaGod Of Boobs
- Location : Boston, MA
Why would it fall apart, we've never actually seen anything for what it is, our total perception is based off electrical impulse. One we accept that, simulation theory becomes a lot more possible.
Plus, people are f**king tweaked beyond reason
Plus, people are f**king tweaked beyond reason
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:12 pm
#54607- hiph0pan0tamusBUNKDRUNK
- Location : In my own little world
where is Jugz when we need him.
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:18 pm
#54609- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
Sure, but it's just the new skeptic's argument in the same old clothes.
It falls apart....with all the other skeptical arguments that have come and gone over the last 4 centuries.
It falls apart....with all the other skeptical arguments that have come and gone over the last 4 centuries.
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:20 pm
#54610- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
hiph0pan0tamus wrote:where is Jugz when we need him.
Jugz was bordeline retarded. Arguing with him was like arguing with a dildo.
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:23 pm
#54615- lilaclegendMember
- Location : not where i want to be
lol i actually thought this might turn to an interesting thread where i could learn some new things. jugz is mentioned, then dildo's come into the discussion.
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:24 pm
#54616- ChisaGod Of Boobs
- Location : Boston, MA
Kaz--Money wrote:Sure, but it's just the new skeptic's argument in the same old clothes.
It falls apart....with all the other skeptical arguments that have come and gone over the last 4 centuries.
So remind me of the argument on reality that stuck?
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:25 pm
#54619- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
lilaclegend wrote:lol i actually thought this might turn to an interesting thread where i could learn some new things. jugz is mentioned, then dildo's come into the discussion.
lmao.
Let it get some traction lilac. definitely an interesting discussion. But, I have an obligation to respond to "Juggz" with used dildos/dildoes. Never had to pluralize that before.
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:25 pm
#54620- lilaclegendMember
- Location : not where i want to be
so what exactly is your theory of the universe and reality ?
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:46 pm
#54634- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
Sheeeeeiitteeee......cooking dinner right now. So, it's Spaghetti. May have to come back....
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:47 pm
#54635- lilaclegendMember
- Location : not where i want to be
Kaz--Money wrote:lilaclegend wrote:lol i actually thought this might turn to an interesting thread where i could learn some new things. jugz is mentioned, then dildo's come into the discussion.
lmao.
Let it get some traction lilac. definitely an interesting discussion. But, I have an obligation to respond to "Juggz" with used dildos/dildoes. Never had to pluralize that before.
lmao.. i dunno if it is dildos or dildoes.. i faced the same problem lol. maybe we can call them dildii
Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:54 pm
#54636- ChisaGod Of Boobs
- Location : Boston, MA
I tend to favor the spelling without the "e"
Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:22 pm
#54638- hiph0pan0tamusBUNKDRUNK
- Location : In my own little world
its dildi
- Sponsored content
Create an account or log in to leave a reply
You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|