black ops vs mw2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:35 pm
#20505- bpy2k111Member
What's your favorite
Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:38 pm
#20506- sharpPUSB
- Location : City of Dreams, England
MW2
Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:42 pm
#20508- BamaGoodfellaMember
- Location : Alabama
MW2 by far. In fact I still play it pretty often. BO was beyond broken!!!
Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:43 pm
#20509- vnzuelan dudeMember
MW2. Even with all the cheap bullcrap.
Better connection > Any problems that the game had.
Plus a larger variety of competitive weapons instead of AUGalilMAS74u
Still like the innovative things that Black Ops brought, such as Wager Matches and Theater mode.
But in straight up multiplayer, the connection is dog shit and the community is dog shit.
Better connection > Any problems that the game had.
Plus a larger variety of competitive weapons instead of AUGalilMAS74u
Still like the innovative things that Black Ops brought, such as Wager Matches and Theater mode.
But in straight up multiplayer, the connection is dog shit and the community is dog shit.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:49 pm
#20511Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:35 pm
#20522- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
There was a lot of excitement for MW2 when it first came out.
IW was on the high from thier COD4 success, and a double high because most people hated WaW.
Unfortunately, MW2 was what changed the game forever, for the worse, as was evidenced by the way fun maps like Vacant and Crash played once they were brought back as DLC for MW2.
BO had ghost, ghost and ghost, but at least they didn't pander to the QS tards, the KS whores, and magic lunge knifers.
BO > MW2
IW was on the high from thier COD4 success, and a double high because most people hated WaW.
Unfortunately, MW2 was what changed the game forever, for the worse, as was evidenced by the way fun maps like Vacant and Crash played once they were brought back as DLC for MW2.
BO had ghost, ghost and ghost, but at least they didn't pander to the QS tards, the KS whores, and magic lunge knifers.
BO > MW2
Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:40 pm
#20528- AlphaI like Pink
Express BO = Early days of MW2
Both core lobbies are crap now. Join outside of Express and its 5-6 bush wookies, every game. MW2 is 2-3 Cold Blood, 2 OMA, 1 asking to boost.
Both core lobbies are crap now. Join outside of Express and its 5-6 bush wookies, every game. MW2 is 2-3 Cold Blood, 2 OMA, 1 asking to boost.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:48 pm
#20532- BamaGoodfellaMember
- Location : Alabama
Alpha wrote:Express BO = Early days of MW2
Both core lobbies are crap now. Join outside of Express and its 5-6 bush wookies, every game. MW2 is 2-3 Cold Blood, 2 OMA, 1 asking to boost.
Been playing with Skunky (from C4B / \V/ clan) almost every night lately, and maybe it's just the European lobbies but I rarely see anyone using cold blooded or OMA. As for the boosting, I get 1-2 requests for challenge lobbies every night (mainly French people LOL).
Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:54 pm
#20534- AlphaI like Pink
Shadow always boost. Dude plays once a month and is max prestige by December.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:04 pm
#20535Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:18 pm
#20537- vnzuelan dudeMember
But the connectiiiiiioooooooonKaz--Money wrote:There was a lot of excitement for MW2 when it first came out.
IW was on the high from thier COD4 success, and a double high because most people hated WaW.
Unfortunately, MW2 was what changed the game forever, for the worse, as was evidenced by the way fun maps like Vacant and Crash played once they were brought back as DLC for MW2.
BO had ghost, ghost and ghost, but at least they didn't pander to the QS tards, the KS whores, and magic lunge knifers.
BO > MW2
The awful lag compensatiiiiiooooon
Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:45 pm
#20539- Triple_0_OughtMember
MW2. No OMA/DC and no nukes, and that would've been the only CoD in existence as far as I'm concerned.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:08 pm
#20540- vnzuelan dudeMember
You forgot pain killer, martydom, last stand, final stand.. etc etc
Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:25 pm
#20541- BamaGoodfellaMember
- Location : Alabama
vnzuelan dude wrote:But the connectiiiiiioooooooon
The awful lag compensatiiiiiooooon
^^^ THIS!!!! Made the game completely unplayable. Also, the fact that you couldn't hear other players due to no footstep noise AND completely unnecessary background noise (ie. trains, rockets launching, etc.), and this was by far the worst piece of shit to ever wear the Call of Duty label!
Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:33 pm
#20542BamaGoodfella wrote:vnzuelan dude wrote:But the connectiiiiiioooooooon
The awful lag compensatiiiiiooooon
^^^ THIS!!!! Made the game completely unplayable. Also, the fact that you couldn't hear other players due to no footstep noise AND completely unnecessary background noise (ie. trains, rockets launching, etc.), and this was by far the worst piece of shit to ever wear the Call of Duty label!
No. MW3 is the worse POS to ever wear COD label.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:39 pm
#20543- BamaGoodfellaMember
- Location : Alabama
Shadow wrote:BamaGoodfella wrote:vnzuelan dude wrote:But the connectiiiiiioooooooon
The awful lag compensatiiiiiooooon
^^^ THIS!!!! Made the game completely unplayable. Also, the fact that you couldn't hear other players due to no footstep noise AND completely unnecessary background noise (ie. trains, rockets launching, etc.), and this was by far the worst piece of shit to ever wear the Call of Duty label!
No. MW3 is the worse POS to ever wear COD label.
MW3 is a GREAT game! It is my second favorite next to COD4.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:49 pm
#20544BamaGoodfella wrote:Shadow wrote:BamaGoodfella wrote:vnzuelan dude wrote:But the connectiiiiiioooooooon
The awful lag compensatiiiiiooooon
^^^ THIS!!!! Made the game completely unplayable. Also, the fact that you couldn't hear other players due to no footstep noise AND completely unnecessary background noise (ie. trains, rockets launching, etc.), and this was by far the worst piece of shit to ever wear the Call of Duty label!
No. MW3 is the worse POS to ever wear COD label.
MW3 is a GREAT game! It is my second favorite next to COD4.
lag comp is 40x worse than bo. fact!
Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:03 pm
#20546- Triple_0_OughtMember
Depends on whom you ask. MW3 lag comp is far better for me than BO, where I often couldn't even spot the enemies that were killing me. For other people, the exact opposite true.
But no CoD can touch MW2 in terms of connection. CoD4 was pretty good, but even just the lack of host migration could be a pain in the rear. Also, I've had red bar games in MW2 that played better than the average game in BO/MW3.
But no CoD can touch MW2 in terms of connection. CoD4 was pretty good, but even just the lack of host migration could be a pain in the rear. Also, I've had red bar games in MW2 that played better than the average game in BO/MW3.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:11 pm
#20547- BamaGoodfellaMember
- Location : Alabama
Triple_0_Ought wrote:Depends on whom you ask. MW3 lag comp is far better for me than BO, where I often couldn't even spot the enemies that were killing me. For other people, the exact opposite true.
But no CoD can touch MW2 in terms of connection. CoD4 was pretty good, but even just the lack of host migration could be a pain in the rear. Also, I've had red bar games in MW2 that played better than the average game in BO/MW3.
BO connections were worse than Wal-Mart dial-up, and every "patch" made the connections worse. You're right about MW2, no game in the COD series has come close to having connections that good. Like I said, I can play on 2 bars in a UK lobby on MW2 and STILL have a better connection than anything BO ever offered to me. Shadow pretends that BO was a good game, but I remember he used to complain about the connections almost as much as I did LOL.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:33 pm
#20550- SyndromeAdmin
- Location : Ohio, USA
MW2 > Blops.
Thats both at their prime.
MW2 had a ton of momentum like Kaz mentioned.
Blops was the first game to publicly display stats in lobbies right? That is where the game became more competitive than it should be and fun took a turn for the worse.
Blops connection for me was better than MW3. Hands down. I think that lends itself to the fact that blops bullet damage was not so damn high.
Im not even sure I cared about connection in MW2 as much.
Thats both at their prime.
MW2 had a ton of momentum like Kaz mentioned.
Blops was the first game to publicly display stats in lobbies right? That is where the game became more competitive than it should be and fun took a turn for the worse.
Blops connection for me was better than MW3. Hands down. I think that lends itself to the fact that blops bullet damage was not so damn high.
Im not even sure I cared about connection in MW2 as much.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:37 pm
#20551- ChisaGod Of Boobs
- Location : Boston, MA
I really love both games, but the community ruined MW2 far worse than they ruined BO
MW2 was so close to being the best game ever, but the inclusion of OMA/DC/Commando and refillable tubes/claymores kept it from being it. It made the game WAY too enticing for noobs to abuse the easy mode shit that was game breaking. Otherwise, it had great maps, fun weapons, and good connections.
BO had connection problems and some frame rate issues, but I still had a lot of fun with it and still do when I play it.
It shouldn't even be close, MW2 with a few tweaks is a FAR better game, but since it is the way it is, I'm sticking with Black Ops.
MW2 was so close to being the best game ever, but the inclusion of OMA/DC/Commando and refillable tubes/claymores kept it from being it. It made the game WAY too enticing for noobs to abuse the easy mode shit that was game breaking. Otherwise, it had great maps, fun weapons, and good connections.
BO had connection problems and some frame rate issues, but I still had a lot of fun with it and still do when I play it.
It shouldn't even be close, MW2 with a few tweaks is a FAR better game, but since it is the way it is, I'm sticking with Black Ops.
Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:20 pm
#20552[quote="BamaGoodfella"]
BO Connections > MW3 Connections.
I played 3 months on 1 bar in BO and never raged as much as I do on a 3 bar in MW3.
BLOPS gets my vote.
MW2 had the fun in it.
Syn, WAW had the stat mid-game thingy too. (I think)
Triple_0_Ought wrote: Shadow pretends that BO was a good game, but I remember he used to complain about the connections almost as much as I did LOL.
BO Connections > MW3 Connections.
I played 3 months on 1 bar in BO and never raged as much as I do on a 3 bar in MW3.
BLOPS gets my vote.
MW2 had the fun in it.
Syn, WAW had the stat mid-game thingy too. (I think)
Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:11 am
#20570- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
Syn makes a good point. I didn't even really understand connections back in MW2, or COD4 for that matter.
For a long time, I just chalked it up to me better than someone, or someone better than me. I didn't understand that everyone had a different view of what was going on, based on what was really going on.
MW3 has been consistently as bad as BO was at it's worst for me.
I ran a 1.72 kd or something in that game, and that was with the lag, with the rage, with the ghosts, with the Famas and 74u's all coming at me.
I ran small streaks, played objective modes, and had way more fun.
MW3, doesn't even register as a game. I mean, here we are just over a month left until BO2, and I just tipped the 9 days mark. BO had 20 days by now.
The only thing I like about MW3 is the fluidity the player can have (for me, it's always molasses feeling). Don't know if that's a framerate issue or what, but when things aren't the shttiest of the sht, the movement feels more snappy and tight.
MW3, as shadow said, doesn't even deserve the COD label.
....or the 'game' label. It's a piece of sht. Period.
For a long time, I just chalked it up to me better than someone, or someone better than me. I didn't understand that everyone had a different view of what was going on, based on what was really going on.
MW3 has been consistently as bad as BO was at it's worst for me.
I ran a 1.72 kd or something in that game, and that was with the lag, with the rage, with the ghosts, with the Famas and 74u's all coming at me.
I ran small streaks, played objective modes, and had way more fun.
MW3, doesn't even register as a game. I mean, here we are just over a month left until BO2, and I just tipped the 9 days mark. BO had 20 days by now.
The only thing I like about MW3 is the fluidity the player can have (for me, it's always molasses feeling). Don't know if that's a framerate issue or what, but when things aren't the shttiest of the sht, the movement feels more snappy and tight.
MW3, as shadow said, doesn't even deserve the COD label.
....or the 'game' label. It's a piece of sht. Period.
Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:04 am
#20571- RyanMember
- Location : North west UK
I know the teams from mw2 to mw3 changed but really, they had a damn solid platform.
No way in hell does mw2 and 3 come close with whatever engine they are running. All the had to do was take out oma/commando, take tubes off the replenish list, add in the new bs to keep the kids happy and it would of worked.
Blops for me was unplayable more often than not, Frame rate issues everytime someone fired a bullet, leaving me firing 10ft to the left of the guy I saw.
When blops worked it was fun, when mw2 worked it really was fun but players ruined mw2 more than the devs did.
Mw3.... Not sure, I'll let you know when it actually works.
No way in hell does mw2 and 3 come close with whatever engine they are running. All the had to do was take out oma/commando, take tubes off the replenish list, add in the new bs to keep the kids happy and it would of worked.
Blops for me was unplayable more often than not, Frame rate issues everytime someone fired a bullet, leaving me firing 10ft to the left of the guy I saw.
When blops worked it was fun, when mw2 worked it really was fun but players ruined mw2 more than the devs did.
Mw3.... Not sure, I'll let you know when it actually works.
Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:29 pm
#20579- Kaz--MoneyMember
- Location : Calgary, AB, Canada
Booster wrote:
Blops for me was unplayable more often than not, Frame rate issues everytime someone fired a bullet, leaving me firing 10ft to the left of the guy I saw.
I was hollering at a death last night...."Same gun, same range, same sightline....I fired first, how the fck did I die"
Syn responded, "he's more accurate".
Doesn't understand that 99% of the time, I'm shooting at a bunch of pixels and have to move my sights a ton until hitmarkers come up.
No one in this game is remotely close to where their pixels say they are. Can't count the killcams that have me shooting someone in the face, and they've already straffed around me with x-hairs locked on and are killing me from behind.
It's an immeasurable time deficit most games. BO, was semi predictable. With MW3, it can be anywhere from 1.5 seconds and longer, but constantly.
- Sponsored content
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
Create an account or log in to leave a reply
You need to be a member in order to leave a reply.
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|